GOTECH CAN SERIES · PART 2 OF 3

CAN bus wiring explained

Before we unplug anything, let's look at the wiring. That connection might also carry the network to another module—or contain termination the network needs.

Original video · 47:103 reasoning checks

GoTech Tips

CORE GOTECH TIP · FROM THIS LESSON

What else did that disconnection change?

The module may be out of the picture, but so may the wiring beyond it or part of the termination. Look at the whole change.

Look at the wiring examples →
More GoTech tips · 1

Same disconnection. Different consequences.

Before unplugging a module, trace what else that connection carries. These two arrangements show why the result can mean different things.

Branch at a junction

Opening one branch at a junction Modules A and B retain their wiring connection through a shared junction. The separate branch to module C is open. The drawing does not establish termination or the health of the remaining network. AJunctionBModule CA–B wiring remains connected Open branch
Opening C’s branch leaves A and B wired together. That alone does not prove they can communicate: termination and other faults still matter.
Watch the junction example · 06:25–09:55 ↗

Wiring through a module connection

Opening a pass-through connection The CAN pair continues through a module connection to the network beyond. Opening that connection breaks the onward path too. Module electronics connect to the bus; they are not series loads. NetworkNetwork beyondConnectionModule electronics Path interrupted
Opening the pass-through connection can disconnect modules beyond it. Their loss of communication does not prove those modules are faulty.
Watch the pass-through example · 17:10–20:50 ↗

Also check termination. Either disconnection may remove termination needed by the remaining network. See why termination changes the result →

Conceptual arrangements from GoTech’s wiring lesson. Paired lines represent CAN H and CAN L; dashed lines mark the disconnected path. Not a vehicle wiring diagram. Termination is omitted so the wiring paths are easier to compare.

PRACTICE IT

Try one before you move on

Make your choice, then compare it with the explanation.

0 of 3 questions compared

QUESTION 01In the pass-through example, do four CAN wires at a module mean there are two protocols?
Read the full explanation
No. They can be two ends of the same network path.

Correct. Two wires can enter and two can continue the same CAN pair. Trace the actual path before deciding there are two networks.

Yes—treat each pair as a separate protocol until a test says otherwise.

The cited harness arrangement already offers another explanation: two ends of one path. Wire count alone cannot select protocols.

The second pair must be a backup path if the module is removed.

Redundancy is not established by four wires. The connector’s pass-through role and actual continuity need to be understood.

Continue to the other two questions →

ONE MORE PART OF THE PICTURE

What does termination do?

When a signal reaches the end of a transmission line, reflections can interfere with communication. Termination helps control those reflections. The video compares the terminating resistors to catchers at the ends of the illustrated network.

Both terminations connected

R1 and R2 bridge CAN H and CAN L at the two ends. Modules A and B connect to the pair.
Two end termination paths are connected in this simplified arrangement.

End module disconnected

The end module and its R2 termination are disconnected. Modules A and B remain connected to the pair with only R1 attached.
A and B stay wired together, but the end module's termination is gone. Wiring continuity alone does not establish that communication will work.

The wiring path

Which modules are still physically connected after the change?

The termination

Did the same change remove termination that the connected section needs?

Both questions matter. A change in communication after unplugging something doesn't identify a bad module by itself.

Watch the termination explanation · 24:00

Concept explanation only. Use the actual wiring and service information for test points, power state and expected values.

Conceptual two-end termination example. Resistors bridge CAN H and CAN L; module electronics are not series loads. The actual vehicle may use a different arrangement.

FROM THE ORIGINAL LESSON

Read the wiring before interpreting the test

Does the network diagram show the physical wiring route?

A simple bus drawing does not show every connector or the route through the harness. Trace where the CAN pair continues before opening a connection. In the pass-through example, wiring continues through the module connection; the CAN transceivers are not electrically connected in series.

Check your thinking

In the source example, what would you need to confirm about the physical path before interpreting a disconnected connector?

What changes when you unplug a module?

At the illustrated junction, opening one branch leaves the other wiring paths joined. In the pass-through example, unplugging the module can also disconnect the network beyond it. The Subaru example combines junctions and direct splices: trace the segment you are testing rather than assigning one layout to the whole car.

Check your thinking

Compare the junction and pass-through examples. What remains connected in each?

Why does CAN bus termination matter during isolation?

The wiring can still be connected while the termination has changed. In the video's isolation example, account for both before deciding what the loss or return of communication tells you.

Check your thinking

Before interpreting the source's isolation example, list which wiring and termination remain in the connected portion.

The car runs, but the scan tool cannot connect—why?

In GoTech’s Jetta case, the car ran but the emissions-test equipment could not communicate. Its K-line diagnostic-access path was distinct from the CAN communication between modules. Identify whether the complaint concerns module communication, the scan-access route or an access restriction before treating them as the same fault.

Check your thinking

What are you trying to distinguish: module-to-module communication, the scan-access route, or permission to use that route?

Keep this example in scope No connector-disconnection sequence, resistor value, universal waveform threshold or current gateway-access policy is prescribed. Physical diagrams and application-specific details remain subject to verification.

PUT IT TO WORK

Two more questions

Use the case details above. Pick an answer, then check the reasoning.

QUESTION 02Unplugging a module also opens the path to modules beyond it. What must you account for before judging the result?
Read the full explanation
Any changed response proves the unplugged module caused the fault.

The change also affected the network beyond the connection. A different response cannot isolate the module by itself.

Which wiring paths and termination changed along with the module.

Trace the paths that remain and any termination removed. Then interpret the scan response in that new configuration.

Using the same scan tool makes both configurations equivalent.

The scan tool is unchanged, but the network being tested is different. Account for that difference before drawing a conclusion.

QUESTION 03What distinction makes the recalled Jetta access problem useful to study?
Read the full explanation
The running engine clears the network, leaving the diagnostic tool as the established cause.

A running engine is compatible with an access-path problem. It does not identify the tool as the cause.

The emissions-tool connection uses the same path as module communication, so both should be judged together.

The source case teaches why those routes must be distinguished rather than assumed identical.

The diagnostic-access route can differ from the route modules use to communicate.

Yes. The case teaches path identification, without establishing a completed repair or a particular failed component.

FROM THE ORIGINAL LESSON

Watch the original GoTech video

47:10

The original lesson compares junction and harness arrangements, then uses the recalled Jetta case to distinguish diagnostic access from module communication.

Original GoTech lesson thumbnail

Video loads only when you choose to play.

YouTube connects only when you choose to play.
Watch on YouTube ↗ · CAN Bus Wiring and Protocol Explained (Part 2)

Watch the full video, or use the timestamp links beside each explanation to jump to that moment.

KEEP THIS

Before judging a changed response, account for the wiring path and termination that changed along with it.

Explain it back · optional

This note stays in this open page. It is not sent, graded or saved; copy it before leaving if you want to keep it.

Review your explanation
  • Did I name the source example and the relevant conditions?
  • Did I separate the observation from my interpretation?
  • Did I say what the evidence still does not establish?
Study sheet · read or print

GOTECH · CAN PART 2 OF 3 · STUDY SHEET

CAN bus wiring explained

Before we unplug anything, let's see what stays connected. An isolation result only makes sense when we know what changed with it.

Removing an end module removes its termination while modules A and B remain wired together.
A and B can stay wired together while termination changes. Concept only.

Three GoTech tips

  1. Follow the wiring before judging the result. Compare a branch off a junction with a connection that carries the network onward. Opening them doesn't necessarily leave the same path.
  2. Account for the termination too. A connection change can remove termination along with a module. Include that change when you interpret the response.
  3. Identify the network you're testing. A protocol name alone doesn't show the physical layout. Use the applicable diagram and test conditions.

Read the two layout examples

A branch off a junction
Trace which other paths stay connected when that branch opens.
An onward connection
Trace what lies beyond the opening. Losing several responses does not, by itself, identify one failed module.

What this does not establish

These are conceptual layouts, not instructions to disconnect a particular vehicle. They do not supply universal resistance limits, connector pins or a substitution procedure.

Your working notes

Which wiring paths changed when the connection opened?

Did termination change too? What does that let you conclude?

Go back to the source

Lesson: https://gotech.com/learn/can-bus/topology-and-protocol/

Written from GoTech's original video; these notes paraphrase the explanation. Technician review and independent verification of source diagrams remain pending.

Next: follow the Ascent investigation

Part 3 puts the ideas together on a no-crank case. Watch how the diagram changes the question.

Mark studied & continue →

Saves your place on this device. Your answers and written note are not saved.

Work through the concept with Ask GoTech →
Source, scope & review

GoTech’s written companion to the original demonstration. Source moments support the case observations; the learning prompts are GoTech editorial guidance.

No connector-disconnection sequence, resistor value, universal waveform threshold or current gateway-access policy is prescribed. Physical diagrams and application-specific details remain subject to verification.

Timestamp links identify supporting passages. They do not independently verify every source diagram or establish a procedure for another vehicle.

Additional source moments
Learning goals and the GoTech way of thinking

Use these prompts when you want to slow down and work through the reasoning.

By the end of this lesson

  • Distinguish a simplified network drawing from physical harness routing.
  • Explain how isolation can change continuity or termination in the cited examples.
  • Separate diagnostic access from the protocol used between modules.

Before you startStart with CAN Part 1: communication paths. Here we look at how those paths are wired.

This lesson’s focus

Use the physical layout to judge what a proposed check would distinguish. Account for every path or connection the change would affect before interpreting its result.

The GoTech way of thinking · 6 steps

WAY OF THINKING

The GoTech way of thinking

01Define the question

What are we actually trying to establish?

02Map the systemAlso used

What components, circuits, networks or relationships matter?

03Observation ≠ conclusion

What did we actually observe, and what are we inferring?

04Find the evidence boundaryAlso used

What does this measurement, source or test establish, and what remains unknown?

05Choose the next checkPrimary focus

What additional evidence would reduce uncertainty the most? Choose a check that helps distinguish the remaining explanations.

06Stop where the evidence stops

Do not turn a plausible explanation into a confirmed fact.

Did this help you move forward?

Optional. No written response is collected.